Go-Live: Differences between Traditional and No-code Approaches
The Go-Live phase is that magical moment in the no-code application development process that symbolizes the start of a true adventure in the world of digital creation. It’s the point where we move away from the intricate lower-level details of traditional software development and focus on what really matters – delivering the first usable version (MVP) of our application to users as quickly as possible!
In today’s article, we aim to provide a solid dose of knowledge to help you navigate this fascinating world.
Go-Live is the stage where the application becomes available to end users. However, the differences between traditional and no-code approaches are significant and can greatly influence how applications are built and deployed. In the following sections, we’ll explore these differences and see why the no-code approach is becoming an increasingly attractive option for businesses aiming to deliver innovative solutions rapidly.
Ultimately, with the right approach, Go-Live doesn’t have to take months or quarters; in many cases, it can be achieved in just a few days or weeks.
Differences in the Go-Live Phase for No-Code Application Deployment
Unlike traditional approaches, where business representatives play almost exclusively the role of external stakeholders defining requirements, no-code allows their active involvement in the development process. Classic development methods often prioritize developer roles while sidelining the direct participation of business teams. However, in the no-code model, business teams take the lead by defining requirements and steering project activities.
This approach often results in increased efficiency, faster creation of intellectual property, and accelerated deployment of no-code applications to end users.
In contrast to traditional development methods, no-code enables earlier user involvement, offering a unique opportunity. With traditional approaches, functional applications are typically available in later stages, often during the acceptance testing phase, making it more challenging and expensive to fix identified issues and implement changes at that point. However, with no-code, user feedback can be gathered from the very beginning of the project since a working application is usually available from the start. This approach allows for incremental adjustments and accelerates project progress.
No-code fosters a seamless flow between ideation, design, and creation stages, thanks to intuitive visual tools. This promotes highly efficient collaboration between the no-code team and business stakeholders. Moreover, it eliminates delays associated with waiting for user feedback, bypassing the challenges of managing a future backlog. Instead, no-code teams can quickly respond to feedback during daily or weekly sessions. While scope management remains critical, leveraging MVP criteria enables the swift resolution of smaller, MVP-relevant issues reported by users.
Focus on the Goal
When building software with a no-code model, don’t lose sight of the ultimate goal: delivering your MVP as quickly as possible. One of the key benefits of no-code development is its ability to streamline the steps of the traditional software creation process, enabling faster delivery of applications to end users.
No-code platforms offer the opportunity to transform key elements of the software development process. Rather than adhering to traditional approaches, it’s worth harnessing the potential of no-code and fully leveraging its capabilities to launch the needed application within days or weeks, not months.